Phase I clinical trial outcomes in 93 patients with brain metastases: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
نویسندگان
چکیده
e16546 Background: Patients with brain metastases are often excluded from clinical trials, but it is unclear if they pose an enhanced risk. METHODS We reviewed the records of 1,181 consecutive patients with and without brain metastases treated in the Phase I Clinical Trials Program. We compared clinical outcomes in patients who presented with and without brain metastases during the same time period. RESULTS Of 1,181 patients, 93 had brain metastases at the time of referral (median: age, 54 yrs, number of prior therapies, n=4). The rates of stable disease ≥ 4 months/ partial/ complete response in patients with and without brain metastases were 17% and 27%, respectively (p= 0.03). Although the median survival for patients with brain metastases was shorter than for that of patients without brain metastases (7.5 vs. 10.3 months; p = 0.002), in multivariate analysis the presence of brain metastases was not an independent factor predicting survival. There was no difference in time-to-treatment failure (TTF) (1.74 vs. 1.84 months, respectively; p = 0.61) or in Grade 3-4 toxicity (including neurologic) between patients with and without brain metastases (12% vs. 10%, p = 0.77). When treatment-related neurotoxicity ≥Grade 3-4 was compared between 93 patients with brain metastases and 527 patients without brain metastases treated in the same protocols, the respective rates were 4.3% (n=4) and 2.27% (n=12) (p 0.435). CONCLUSIONS The rates of survival and response of patients with brain metastases were lower than those for other patients in the Phase I setting, but the presence of brain metastases was not an independent prognostic factor predicting survival, indicating that other covariates that co-exist with brain metastases were more significant. TTF for patients with brain metastases was not decreased, nor was the incidence of serious side effects (including neurotoxicity) increased, suggesting that these patients should be eligible for early clinical trials.
منابع مشابه
Effect of saffron on liver metastases in patients suffering from cancers with liver metastases: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
Objective: Cancer represents the second cause of mortality in the world. Saffron as a medicinal plant is known for its anti-cancer and anti-depressant properties. In this randomized double blind clinical trial, the effects of saffron on response to treatment in patients suffering from liver metastasis were evaluated. Materials and Methods: Thirteen patients suffering from liver metastases who r...
متن کاملCharacteristics and outcomes for patients with advanced vaginal or vulvar cancer referred to a phase I clinical trials program: the MD Anderson cancer center experience
BACKGROUND Early-stage vaginal and vulvar cancer can be cured. But outcomes of patients with metastatic disease are poor. Thus, new therapeutic strategies are urgently required. METHODS In this retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical outcomes of consecutive patients with metastatic vaginal or vulvar cancer who were referred to a phase I trial clinic between January 2006 and December 201...
متن کاملBayesian clinical trials at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.
BACKGROUND The Bayesian approach is being used increasingly in medical research. In particular, it has become a standard in designing clinical trials at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. PURPOSE / METHODS To address the extent and nature of Bayesian trials conducted at M. D. Anderson, we reviewed the protocols registered in the Protocol Document Online System between 200...
متن کاملCancer Therapy: Clinical Survival of 1,181Patients inaPhase IClinic: TheMDAnderson Clinical Center for Targeted Therapy Experience
Purpose: To determine whether the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH; London, UK) prognostic score for phase I patients can be validated in a large group of individuals seen in a different center and whether other prognostic variables are also relevant, we present an analysis of 1,181 patients treated in the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC; Houston, TX) phase I clinic. Experimental Design: Medical re...
متن کاملSurvival of 1,181 patients in a phase I clinic: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experience.
PURPOSE To determine whether the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH; London, UK) prognostic score for phase I patients can be validated in a large group of individuals seen in a different center and whether other prognostic variables are also relevant, we present an analysis of 1,181 patients treated in the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC; Houston, TX) phase I clinic. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Medical re...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
دوره 17 12 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011